Authentication using many factors for your business's online services

Advice for companies on how to use multi-factor authentication (MFA) to secure corporate internet services.

This guide outlines the best practices for multi-factor authentication (MFA) for administrators who oversee their organization’s online digital service access. It supports the use of services that support the strength of MFA you need, outlines several typical MFA kinds, and identifies some potential hazards.

In this guidance

Why MFA matters

Prior to the widespread use of public cloud services, businesses housed their digital corporate services on their own property, which they could only access through their local network. These services were enhanced with usernames and passwords to verify requests for access to company information. Physical connectivity to the network from within the office building served as a “pseudo second factor” for these services. In other words, the user verifies their identity by proving they

  • own the right secret password.
  • exist on the actual private network.

However, organizations are increasingly storing their corporate sensitive data in online services (that is, services that are exposed to the internet). These online services are frequently hosted in the cloud or on-premises and accessible via a remote connection, like zero trust network access (ZTNA) or a virtual private network (VPN).

The loss of this pseudosecond factor, or the inability to access the network solely locally, means that relying solely on a password to authenticate a user to an online service is insufficient to safeguard sensitive information.

Because passwords can be stolen in a variety of ways, administrators are advised to use multi-factor authentication (MFA) in the NCSC’s password guidelines. However, in response to increased adoption of MFA, attackers have developed new methods to access accounts protected by weaker methods of MFA. For example:

  • the one-time password (OTP) interception attack, also known as the “machine-in-the-middle attack,” in which a user is tricked into entering their OTP code on a phishing website that is disguised to give the attacker the credentials they need to log in as that user.
  • Push notification fatigue attack, also known as “prompt bombing attack,” occurs when a user is repeatedly prompted to approve a request until they unintentionally approve the attacker’s sign-in.

Implement the strongest available MFA options

Establishing support for the most dependable MFA techniques is crucial so that future users of your corporate service can select their favorite approach from among all the options that satisfy your business’s security requirements and risk tolerance for safeguarding corporate data.

Certain MFA implementations provide “stronger” security than others, as this guideline makes clear. However, we also recognize there may be technical or cost considerations that limit your choice. For this reason, it’s important to remember that any implementation of MFA is still superior to reliance on passwords alone.

Provide users with a choice of authentication

MFA can be achieved in a variety of ways, each with unique security, usability, and accessibility advantages and disadvantages. Mandating the use of a single method of MFA may seem like the easiest approach, but it often means you end up with frustrated users forced to adopt your specified method when there are more secure or usable alternatives available.

For example:

  • Enforcing the use of an OTP code-based generator for all employees is a feasible solution that functions for employees even in locations with weak mobile signals; however, it necessitates that all employees possess a reliable mobile device or generator. For those staff that already have a trusted mobile device, they may be able to benefit from the use of phishing-resistant MFA options (like FIDO2 or challenge-based authentication) as well.
  • Although requiring everyone to use a roaming FIDO2 key is phishing-resistant, portable, and does not require a mobile signal, it can be expensive to implement for all employees and adds another device for them to carry around (and possibly forget or lose). For those staff that already have a trusted mobile device, they may be able to benefit from platform-based FIDO2 keys or an authenticator app.

NEXT PAGE

Recommended types of multi-factor authentication

CYBERSECURITY SMART AWARENESS

Follow us

USEFUL LINKS

GCHQ
MI5
SIS
NPSA

ABOUT CSSA

What we do
What is cyber security?
Equality, diversity and inclusion
Incident management
Leadership team
Careers

ABOUT THIS WEBSITE

Privacy notice
Cookies
Accessibility
Terms & conditions
Social media policy